Tuesday, 17 January 2012

It's a Girl!

Earlier today, my brave and beautiful wife gave birth to our daughter, Elisabeth Jeanne Marie-Antoinette Craven, weighing in at 3.2 kg (about 7 lbs 2 oz). Baby and mother are doing well.

To add some size to this article I will take the time to explain the significance behind her names.

She takes her first name after St. Elizabeth Seton. This is meaningful to us on many levels: As the first American-born saint to be canonized, the name calls attention to my American roots. As a convert from Episcopalianism, she shares more in common with me than just her nationality, and I am fascinated by the many parallels between her life and that of the later Bl. John Henry Newman. As a teacher, she also shares an important trait with Emilie, to say nothing of being a mother and daughter.

Her middle names have significance for both my family and Emilie's. Jeanne is the name of one of Emilie's great-grandmothers, and (in English as Jean), of my beloved paternal grandmother. Marie-Antoinette is the name of another of Emilie's great-grandmothers, who only left us a few years ago, having lived past a hundred. On my side, the name is that of my great-great-grandmother, whose father fought under Sherman in the Civil War.

Her parents and her older brother are both overjoyed at the arrival of the little lady, and are looking forward to getting to know her better in the days and months ahead!

Posted by jon at 11:03 PM in Fatherhood 
 

Sunday, 15 January 2012

College Profile: Balliol College

This is an article in my series on Oxford's colleges and PPHs. These 'profiles' are based entirely on my own personal perspective and opinions; prospective students are advised to look rather to the prospectus and alternative prospectus of any college they are considering applying to, rather than place too much stock in my descriptions. Previous articles describe what colleges are, then discuss Nuffield College, the PPHs, All Souls' College, University College, St. Antony's College, Christ Church, Oriel College, Pembroke College, and Magdalen College.

In the interest of balancing out my previous article on "T'Oriel", I shall turn now to the college with the Labour party reputation, Balliol. In so doing, the first thing I should point out, again, is that these stereotypes are blown way out of proportion. The head of the university Labour party was recently an Orielensis, and Boris Johnson, mayor of London and a prominent Tory, went to Balliol. So all these things need to be taken with a grain of salt. These are educational institutions which recycle their entire student body every few years, after all. Ποταμοῖσι τοῖσιν αὐτοῖσιν ἐμϐαίνουσιν, ἕτερα καὶ ἕτερα ὕδατα ἐπιρρεῖ.

Some of Balliol's most famous alumni are Adam Smith (who doubtless would not have been a Labour supporter!), John Wycliff, and Aldus Huxley. Founded in 1263, it is, with Merton and Univ, one of the contenders for the title of oldest Oxford college, and it commands a great deal of prestige, making it one of the harder colleges to get into.

In spite of that, the reason for its popularity is not immediately apparent. Balliol does not have the most impressive buildings (Christ Church), nor the richest endowment (St. John's), nor the best sporting record (Oriel), nor the highest academic success (Merton, as measured by the Norrington table).

Nonetheless, to a large segment of the "in-the-know" applicant population, there is no more fashionable college choice than Balliol. I suppose this is due to its all-around strength—while Balliol might not have claim to any superlatives, except a (dubious) claim to being oldest, it does rank highly in nearly every criteria one might come up with. So, it is not surprising at all that Balliol should come out on the top of many a student's personal ranking criteria.

Either that, or a vague perception among 18 year-olds that Balliol's "connections" somehow make it a pathway to power.

What Balliol does have is large grounds (especially in comparison to the nearby PPHs and Turl Street colleges), a fantastic location, and beautiful architecture that matches quite closely with the ideal of what a 'typically Oxbridge' college should look like. It is an easy college to fall in love with.

Fortunately, in my experience, the actual people who do attend Balliol are quite nice, and show nothing of the "superiority complex" that I had half-expected to find. Perhaps therein lies the true secret to Balliol's popularity: you're bound to get more applicants if the people who visit you go away convinced that your college has a great bunch of people to be around.

Posted by jon at 2:40 PM in Oxford 
 

Friday, 30 December 2011

College Profile: Magdalen College

This is an article in my series on Oxford's colleges and PPHs. These 'profiles' are based entirely on my own personal perspective and opinions; prospective students are advised to look rather to the prospectus and alternative prospectus of any college they are considering applying to, rather than place too much stock in my descriptions. Previous articles describe what colleges are, then discuss Nuffield College, the PPHs, All Souls' College, University College, and St. Antony's College, Christ Church, Oriel College, and Pembroke College.

The first quirk to know about Magdalen College is that its name is pronounced "Maudlin" (an archetypical shibboleth for exposing outsiders). The second is that the choir sings from the tower to greet the dawn on May 1st. Third, they have their own deer park. With deer.

Magdalen, then, can lay as much claim as any place in Oxford for having the sort of eccentric traditions that Oxbridge is so famous for. (Speaking of eccentrics, Oscar Wilde was a member.) It can also lay claim to the most beautiful specimens of that amazing architecture that Oxbridge is famous for.

In fact, it is widely considered to be the most æsthetically pleasing college in all of Oxford or Cambridge. And it is very wealthy to boot. (Did I mention they own their own deer park?)

For all these reasons, Magdalen is one of the harder colleges to get into, in spite of its large size. For this reason alone, it was never really on my list of college choices personally (risk of refusal was an important factor in my college selection, as I vehemently did not want to be pooled—though happily the question was moot, as I was accepted into my first choice college Oriel). But, on the other hand, that selectivity is about the only criticial thing I can come up with to say about Magdalen. If your biggest problem is that you are so popular that everyone wants to be associated with you, I'd say that means you are doing pretty well.

I did have multiple occasions to visit Magdalen, however, and their world-famous choir's evensong is not to be missed. I was also lucky enough to get in to view some of the rare books in their old library, although unfortunately I did not attend a formal hall there. It really is a gorgeous place, in fact I would go so far as to say that among the 'super-popular' colleges, it is the most deserving of its reputation as a desirable place to study. Magdalen undoubtedly deserves to be grouped among those colleges that embody Oxford at its finest.

Posted by jon at 1:56 AM in Oxford 
 

Saturday, 10 December 2011

College Profile: Pembroke College

This is an article in my series on Oxford's colleges and PPHs. These 'profiles' are based entirely on my own personal perspective and opinions; prospective students are advised to look rather to the prospectus and alternative prospectus of any college they are considering applying to, rather than place too much stock in my descriptions. Previous articles describe what colleges are, then discuss Nuffield College, the PPHs, All Souls' College, University College, and St. Antony's College, Christ Church, and Oriel College.

Typically the first building a visitor to Oxford lays eyes on, if arriving by train, is "my own"—the Saïd Business School. It is a large, imposing building that greets you immediately as you step out of the train station—very handy for our visiting speakers and recruiters coming from London!

When I first visited Oxford, though, we were visiting by car and arrived via the Park & Ride bus, a short distance away from the University. Approaching from the angle we did, Pembroke College was the first Oxford University building I laid eyes on, and so in spite of its small size and tucked-away location, it has never been a college to get lost in the crowd for me.

Like Corpus Christi, Pembroke's primary advantages are in being ancient (it was founded in 1625), and yet small and relatively unknown: it is a hidden treasure. While students at the neighbouring Christ Church are constantly annoyed by the throngs of tourists blocking their way and making them late for tutorials, Pembroke students enjoy the splendour of a traditional Oxford college life in relative tranquility, and can look back to such distinguished alumni as Samuel Johnson, William Blackstone, and King Abdullah of Jordan.

During my year at Oxford, the dining hall was being restored, which is something that has to happen at every historical college from time to time, but for those of us on a one year course it can be quite a shame. The upside, for this year's batch of Pembroke students, though, is that their dining hall is now beautifully restored!

The main downside, as far as I can tell, is that their sporting colour is pink.

Posted by jon at 5:46 PM in Oxford 
 

Friday, 25 November 2011

The New 52

One of the most impressive applications of the iPad, and the one that sold me on the tablet format the most when the device came out, was the digital comics application developed by Comixology (which also appears as single-brand apps under the Marvel, DC, etc. names). Being able to buy comics digitally was immediately interesting to me as an expatriate, and the similar form factor of the iPad made the reading experience feel largely the same—better, in fact, since the vibrant colours of the screen are richer than the newsprint of actual comic books.

I read a few comics when I got my iPad, but nothing really gripped me to an extent that I stayed with any series, and with the MBA going on last year I hardly had any spare time for such frivolities anyway.

This September, however, DC comics took the radical step of restarting all of their books—Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman, you name it, 52 titles in all, in a massive initiative dubbed "The New 52". At around the same time, I began listening to a comics podcast called The Comics Conspiracy, sister podcast to another podcast (The Geekbox), that I had long listened to. The combination of their enthusiasm for comic books, and the new jumping in point provided by the new 52 initiative, has seen me return to the world of comic books, for the first time since I was a teenager.

From Marvel to DC

Back then, like the majority of comic readers, I was a Marvel fan. Listening to the podcast, I learned that it was common for people to start out preferring Marvel comic books in adolescence, only to move to DC when they become adults. This struck me as odd, but their justification made sense: Marvel books tend to feature characters dealing with real-world problems (Peter Parker, the bullied nerd, the X-Men, coming of age coping with the things that make them different from other people). Adolescents identify readily with these characters.

Adults, on the other hand, especially the ones who might still indulge in reading comic books, are more likely to feel like they have enough of the real world in their own lives. Picking up a comic book is an act of nostalgia—and an act of escapism. Escapism is where DC books come into their own—the Green Lantern, participating in interplanetary intrigues, Aquaman vying for control of the throne of Atlantis. Even the gritty Batman is a billionaire with essentially unlimited resources at his disposal. He doesn't struggle with the same problems the rest of us do. To one audience, that might make him seem more remote; to another, it is precisely what makes him interesting.

Another factor seems to be that Marvel books have been of lower quality of late then when I used to read them in the 90s—crossover and event fatigue has left many fans abandoning books, even when they prefer the characters. (This is all hearsay, but it's a view I've heard from more than one quarter.) Between that and the DC universe making a new start, I have jumped onto the New 52, and share below my impressions from the books I decided to pick up.

Titles

Justice League

This is a great book for introducing readers to the whole DC universe, and is well-drawn, funny, and well-written, too. The heroes are meeting for the first time (most of them shocked to discover that Batman is real), so there's really no background knowledge required to enjoy the book. It makes for an exciting read, gives you a lot of super-hero bang for you buck, and yet requires none of the background knowledge ensemble super hero titles usually do—you get the best of both worlds.

I'll definitely keep reading this one as it is the best way to get to know the DC universe, which I am keen on getting to know as well as I know that of the X-Men or the Avengers.

Action Comics

This is another one with no background required. Superman has just started appearing around Metropolis, and no one knows who or what he really is. He's a bit more like the Golden Age Superman, in terms of powers (if a tank shoots him in the stomach, he will get the wind knocked out of him, and go down). He's fighting city corruption, not intergalactic menaces, and the whole book has its feet on the ground a lot more than I necessarily expect from a Superman title.

I bought this title fully expecting to only read the first book, but I'm actually really enjoying it, and think I'll stay subscribed to this one too. It's much better than I thought it was going to be.

Detective Comics

I'm planning on sticking with this one, too, as I feel I should at least give it a few full story arcs before deciding on whether it's for me. Detective Comics, as its name implies, is a more involved book, and I don't think it's fair to judge it based on only a few issues. The first story arc is off to a great start, though—an intriguing new case involving the Joker. There's no reboot, here: characters like Batman, Alfred, Gordon, and the Joker are all already here, but the title does take the time to characterise each one, so that even if some are new to you, you are told who they are straight away. This is a far darker, gorier title than the first two, though, which are more family-friendly fare. The main Batman title has been getting rave reviews too, but I haven't seen it yet.

Batman and Robin

Robin now is Bruce Wayne's son, with whom he was only recently re-united, and with whom he has a somewhat strained relationship. (The original Robin is now called Nightwing, and stars in his own book.) This takes away the... questionableness of Batman and Robin's old relationship, and replaces it with one that, as a father, I can identify with right away. With so many Batman titles to chose from, one needs some kind of selection criteria to help decide which ones to read, and my interest in the father-son dynamic decided me for this one.

So this book had my interest piqued, and I thought the first issue was great. But in the second, Robin comes across as a bit too warped—and I have no comprehension of what's going on with this villain we keep seeing. So, I'm putting this book on probation, but I hope it lives up to its potential.

Aquaman

I heard a lot of great things about this after the launch, so I decided to give it a read. I am by no means an Aquaman fan, but part of the point of the book is that Aquaman is nobody's favourite super-hero. When he surprises a group of machine-gun toting bank robbers, once they realise it's Aquaman they burst out laughing: what's the guy who's power is talking to fish going to do to them? (Answer: kick their asses.)

So this book is setting out to make Aquaman cool again, and that is interesting enough of a challenge for me to want to read it. I don't expect that I'll still be reading Aquaman two years from now, but for now, it's an interesting book with excellent artwork.

Justice League: Dark

One of the interesting thing about the new 52 is that, despite what I've described so far here, there are lots of titles that have nothing to do with superheros. Titles like All Star Western, Men of War, Swamp Thing, I, Vampire, and many others show that comic books are a great medium for science fiction, horror, suspense, war stories, and westerns as well. I think that this is pretty cool, and like to think that my tastes are more varied than just wanting to read about men in tights, but for one reason or another none of the 'alternative' titles really jumped out at me.

Justice League: Dark is a magic and supernatural-oriented spinoff of the Justice League, committed to fighting evils of a demonic or esoteric origin (things that can't be overcome by Superman's strength alone, is the idea, although I think it's pretty clear that the "Justice League" bit was tagged onto this title in order to encourage a broader audience to try it out.) I think it should be good as a change-of-pace title, but the first issue didn't sway me one way or the other. It's clearly introducing a big world, so I'll give it time to see whether it will turn out to be all I am imagining. In any event, I really like the art in this book (don't judge it by its cover!)—in fact I'd say it's my favourite looking book of all the titles I read, so it will be no hardship to stick with the title for a while.

Others?

Clearly, my selections only scratched the surface of the 52 titles that are available. The others I decided against for various reasons, but I thought I should at least mention the most notable omissions. Wonder Woman had great critical reception, and I'm fascinated by the character, whom, it turns out, I really know nothing about. But I don't like the art style of the book at all (especially in contrast to how gorgeous she looks in Justice League), so I passed on it.

Animal Man also got rave reviews, but it seems a little dark for my tastes. Swamp Thing, similarly, is also supposed to be good, but I was afraid it would be too involved for a new reader to follow what's going on.

I was very interested in picking up a military-themed book, too, but I didn't hear enough buzz about either Blackhawks or Men of War to really believe that they would be worth my time. I may still crack and buy one or both, though, just because I think a good military series would be a great change of pace. In much the same vein, I'd be interested in All Star Western, but the fact that it takes place in Gotham City, on the East coast, seems pretty out-of-place to me.

____________

So, those are my impressions. One thing I have discovered about reading comics again is how the format really lends itself to reading each issue more than once. Yes, you can blaze through an issue in only a few minutes, and at first feel like you've blown your money on something that was way too short, but in one's hurry to zip through the story, one misses a lot of the impact of the artwork the first time through. A second, slower, reading, preferably the next day, allows the atmosphere and storytelling of the book to unfold in a new and different way, as the visual art exerts more influence on the second reading.

It's a medium I'm happy to have rediscovered, and I'm happy that modern technology is helping readers to find the best comics to read, and obtain them digitally, to read in a pristine format.

Posted by jon at 7:55 PM in Gaming 
 

Sunday, 20 November 2011

College Profile: Oriel College

This is an article in my series on Oxford's colleges and PPHs. These 'profiles' are based entirely on my own personal perspective and opinions; prospective students are advised to look rather to the prospectus and alternative prospectus of any college they are considering applying to, rather than place too much stock in my descriptions. Previous articles describe what colleges are, then discuss Nuffield College, the PPHs, All Souls' College, University College, and St. Antony's College, and Christ Church.

It's been several decades now since a certain set of Bible translations came out, and you'll notice a pattern: the New English Bible, the New American Standard Bible, and the New International Version, to name a few. It's really funny. I suspect we'll still be calling them "new this" and "new that" a hundred years from now. Much like New College at Oxford. Do you know when New College was founded? Any guesses? New College was new in 1379.
         —Larry Wall, creator of the Perl programming language

Reading the above quote, in high school, was the first time I ever heard of New College. It immediately led me to wonder what on earth the "Old College" must have been!

The answer is this one, the college more commonly known as Oriel, although it has also been known as "King's College", and its official name is The House of the Blessed Mary the Virgin in Oxford, commonly called Oriel College, of the Foundation of Edward the Second of famous memory, sometime King of England. New College is also dedicated to Our Lady, and it is because there are two St. Mary's Colleges that they are both called by other names, to distinguish them. The name Oriel is not entirely understood: it could refer to the oriel windows (an architectural term), but seems most likely to refer to the large pub called "La Oriole" that stood on the site before the college was built.

As can be inferred from the preceding discussion, that was a long time ago. Begun in 1324 and chartered in 1326, to be precise, Oriel is the oldest college in Oxford of royal foundation, and its coat of arms, a differenced version of the royal arms of England, testifies to Oriel's kingly pedigree. It is a very traditional college: the last to admit women, it holds formal hall six nights a week (with more formality, and better food, than most colleges), and has been nicknamed T'Oriel for the perceived Tory leanings of its student body.

In actual fact, though, Oriel's small student body leads many people of all backgrounds to choose it, because of its friendliness and strong feeling of community. (And some women choose it precisely because it was the last to admit them!) The respect for Oxford traditions at Oriel is not so much a sign of conservatism as it is a recognition of the common desire of those at Oxford to live the university's unique experiences to the fullest. Showing up to formal hall in jeans and a t-shirt, which some colleges allow, cannot but cheapen the experience for everyone present. For me personally, the traditions and history of Oxford are key ingredients of what makes it great, just as much as the brilliant academics. Therefore it only made sense to select a college that would allow me to experience to the utmost all those things that make Oxford "Oxford".

Oriel's reputation university-wide, though, is more than anything associated with its dominance in sport. Oriel has dominated the Head of the River in Eight's Week, Oxford's most important sporting fixture, winning the headship in the majority of the years I've been alive, a phenomenal achievement.

The college, accordingly, features prominently in the 1984 Rob Lowe film Oxford Blues. If that were not fantastic enough as college trivia, Oriel was also the setting for Hugh Grant's first film, Privileged—I don't think you can get more 'typically Oxbridge' than that!

With three main quads, all different architecturally, the college buildings are varied and ample, without seeming too large or too small. The music room, pictured at left, is perhaps my favourite room in the college. The "secret passage" to O'Brian quad also helps give the college some character, as does the ample MCR, already quite large by traditional college standards, and recently enlarged by the addition of a study room on the floor directly above it.

Oriel also provided an outstanding library, holding over 100,000 volumes and open 24 hours a day. The college had multiple copies of all the textbooks I needed for my course. This meant that not only did I not have to buy any textbooks, but I was even able to check out one set, to keep in my room, while still keeping another full set in the library, so I could study at either location without having to carry any books around! That alone made a lot of my non-Oriel classmates pretty envious, I can tell you.

Oriel was my first choice college for a number of reasons, but besides the location (being so old, Oriel sits right in the centre of everything at Oxford), the history, and the respect for Oxford traditions, it was two sets of Oriel alumni that really made me choose Oriel.

First, although Oriel today may have a reputation more for brawn than brains (by Oxford standards, anyway), in Victorian times it was acknowledged as the preëminent college intellectually (a title probably disputed now by Merton and St. John's), and this put it at the heart of the Tractarian movement, with E.B. Pusey, John Keble, and John Henry Newman all fellows of the college at that time. Since this was a period I studied extensively while at McGill, there was a considerable sentimental incentive to actually become a member of the college that sat at the centre of the "Oxford movement", the very place where the Tracts for the Times were written, and where Newman lived and rose to fame. Dining in the same hall he dined in, arguing with friends over some of the same topics he debated with his, and completing my journey following in the same steps he did, was a profoundly significant experience for me.

In my orientation as an MBA student, though, two other, very different, Oriel alumni stood out: Sir Walter Raleigh, and Cecil Rhodes. Indeed, more than any other degree an MBA is about learning to do, to achieve—not to be content with theories or knowledge for its own sake. Leadership ability, entrepreneurial spirit, and real-world results are what we want to get from our MBA experience, and the academic knowledge we gain is sought in order to facilitate and enable that. Raleigh and Rhodes are both figures whose lives may have been controversial, but not even their most vocal critics can deny that they were men of action, and impressive leaders.

I am not suggesting that my intended career path will look anything like either one of those men's, but having their portraits staring down on us was a pretty good motivator to remind us that, once we leave Oriel, we have the potential to change the world.


Floreat Oriel.
Posted by jon at 12:01 AM in Oxford 
 

Thursday, 3 November 2011

College Profile: Christ Church

This is an article in my series on Oxford's colleges and PPHs. These 'profiles' are based entirely on my own personal perspective and opinions; prospective students are advised to look rather to the prospectus and alternative prospectus of any college they are considering applying to, rather than place too much stock in my descriptions. Previous articles describe what colleges are, then discuss Nuffield College, the PPHs, All Souls' College, University College, and St. Antony's College.

If somebody had to select one Oxford college as the archetypical "Oxford", there is little argument that Christ Church would be the one to pick. It has the largest quad by far, and abounds with famous alumni and literary associations: The dining hall was used in filming Harry Potter. It appears in Brideshead Revisited, and is closely associated with Alice in Wonderland.

While many Oxford colleges have impressive chapels (New College, All Souls', and Exeter all spring to mind), Christ Church's "chapel" is actually the cathedral of the diocese of Oxford. Christ Church has produced more prime ministers than every other college put together—and is only two short, on its own, of the total number produced by the entire University of Cambridge. It is the favoured college of the aristocracy—although Japanese Crown Prince Naruhito attended Merton, which accordingly sees itself beset by Japanese tourists to this day. (King Abdullah of Jordan went to Pembroke, but Jordanian tourists are somewhat less commonly seen.) Like its sister college Trinity, Cambridge, Christ Church has long held the reputation as the "it" college, for those who feel the need to identify one.

So much for superlatives. In practice, Magdalen, New, and Balliol are also held by many applicants to be the "it" college, and a dozen more could legitimately protest my not including them on this list. (My own Oriel among them!) The fact is that most students, once admitted, come to realise that their own college is "actually" the best! And as I will describe below, there are plenty of good reasons not to pick Christ Church as well.

Known familiarly as "the House", Christ Church is known for having porters who still wear bowler hats (something more colleges ought to emulate, in my opinion), and for the aforementioned constant swarms of tourists.

In fact, if a tourist asked me "where is the university"—a lot of tourists apparently think that a university can be a single building!—I most often would direct them to Christ Church. (Radcliffe Square, if it was closer, being the other contender.) This is not least because it is the part of the university that is the best equipped to deal with tourists, who are often not allowed elsewhere. (In Oxford, "No tourists" is seen on signs as frequently as one sees "No solicitors" in the US!)

As a college associated with wealth and connections, and with the high-ceilinged, wood panelled rooms of Peckwater Quad being the most luxurious student accommodation in the university, the House has a lot to recommend it. Despite this, I do not think I would have enjoyed being there. Studying at a tourist trap has real disadvantages. (I've heard tales of students being surprised in their bathrobes by tourists, knocking on their door asking if they can take a picture of their room!) Also the enormous size of the college, I suspect, must detract from the sense of community. But of course I am coloured by my clear bias towards Oriel, and so inevitably find Christ Church lacking wherever it differs from my reference point.

In spite of all that, I count being at the black-tie GCR guest dinner, being served high table food in Christ Church's magnificent dining hall at the end of Trinity term, as one of the culminating moments of my Oxford adventure. Raising a glass of port, after a gourmet meal, to toast the Queen, in such an opulent, historical setting, among such distinguished company, truly was a defining Oxford experience.

And so one sees that, while members of other colleges may like to talk down Christ Church, at the end of the day, we are still entirely subject to its magic.

Posted by jon at 7:02 AM in Oxford 
 

Wednesday, 26 October 2011

College Profile: St. Antony's College

This is an article in my series on Oxford's colleges and PPHs. These 'profiles' are based entirely on my own personal perspective and opinions; prospective students are advised to look rather to the prospectus and alternative prospectus of any college they are considering applying to, rather than place too much stock in my descriptions. Previous articles describe what colleges are, then discuss Nuffield College, the PPHs, All Souls' College, and University College.

Like Nuffield College, which I profiled previously, St. Antony's is a graduate-only college with a social sciences focus, that does not admit MBA students in spite of its speciality. (With this article, I have now covered all of the colleges that do not admit MBAs.)

Unlike Nuffield, St. Antony's belongs to one of the waves of college-building that have occurred periodically in the history of the university, namely the one that occurred in the 1960s. At this time a number of colleges were created that catered to the emerging phenomenon of graduate students—and, unlike the existing colleges, many of these were created with a specific subject focus: Templeton for business and management, St. Antony's for international relations, and, somewhat later, Green College for medical graduates.

Actually, many Oxford colleges were created with a specific subject speciality in mind, but these "specialities" tend to disolve after a couple centuries, so these 1960s colleges owe their focus more to their youth than anything. In St. Antony's case, however, the association with international studies is likely to continue for some time, since, besides its own library, the college site also houses the University's Middle East Centre Library, Latin American Centre Library, the Bodleian Japanese Library, and the Russian and Eurasian Studies Centre Library. So any researcher focusing on these areas has a good incentive to apply to St. Antony's as his first-choice college.

Because it uses the buildings of a nineteenth-century Anglican convent, the college architecture is far nicer than one would expect for a 1960s foundation. (St. Stephen's House and St. Cross College also salvage ruins of the Oxford movement for their buildings, with beautiful results—Victorian monasteries being far more attractive architecturally than the kinds of new buildings people were putting up in the 1960s!)

St. Antony's is perhaps best known throughout the university for its lively social scene, capitalising on its diverse and international student body to organise themed bops such as Balkan Night, Latin American Party, and many others, that are widely attended by students from all over the university.

Unfortunately, as I was never in Oxford on weekends, I missed out on these bops, and with no MBA students there, I never had any occasion to interact with St. Antony's College myself.

All the same, I have great respect for a graduate-only college that is able to make such an imprint on the university social scene: sometimes I get the impression that the graduate-only colleges recede into the background a bit, as their students prefer to be involved primarily with their departments, or simply focus on their individual research without getting involved in the larger university at all. Clearly, at St. Antony's, this is not the case, and I commend them for that.

Posted by jon at 1:17 PM in Oxford 
 

Saturday, 22 October 2011

DNA Testing: R1b1b2a1a1d1*

I originally wrote this article for my too-neglected private family tree site. However, given how little information there is out there about genetic genealogy in general, and our R1b1b2a1a1d1* haplotype in particular, I'm making this public in case anyone else with this haplotype might benefit from my historical analysis, or chime in with corrections or counter-theories, in case my own interpretation becomes obsolete.

Thanks to my brother purchasing a genealogical DNA test, we now know something about the direct paternal ancestor of James Craven (born 1806 in Leeds, Yorkshire, England), which should be of interest for any of his descendants. Exactly what we know, though, takes a little unpacking.

Concretely, we know that he was of the Y-DNA haplogroup R1b1b2a1a1d1*, previously known as R1b1c9. This is not atypical for an Englishman, but since "the English" as a race are a mix of Celtic Britons, Germanic Anglo-Saxons, and Norse Vikings, what we would really like to know is which of these origins R1b1b2a1a1d1* points to. Unfortunately, there is no clear-cut answer (that I have found).

Y-DNA testing tests sequences on the Y-chromosome, which is (of course) only present in males, and therefore every male's Y-chromosome-specific parts only come from his father. So, the mutations that mark different populations are only those present in the direct paternal ancestor.

It is rather exciting, being able to know something concrete, if obscure, about your direct paternal ancestor who lived thousands of years ago. However, we must remember that the genetic tests don't tell us anything about any other ancestors (which number in the hundreds or thousands when you go this far back). So that's a first caveat.

For instance, in my case, although this test shows that our paternal-line Craven ancestor had no Irish origins, four of my eight great-great-grandparents (all the women, as it happens) came from Ireland, so I almost certainly have more Irish blood than English, overall, even though it is invisible on this DNA test. (To get a full picture I would have to find a male direct paternal descendent of each of their fathers, and do a Y-DNA test on them; unfortunately I haven't even uncovered who their fathers were yet, let alone whether they have any surviving male descendants!) Forming a more complete genealogical family tree, then, requires enlisting male cousins descended from as many of your other ancestors as you can find. So this discussion only concerns my direct patrilineal line.

So how far back are we talking about with this test? That's the second caveat: scientists are still debating a lot of this. It all depends on when the mutation that makes this haplogroup distinct from that haplogroup occurred, but knowing this is difficult, and the best scientific opinion could change a lot as this new field advances. So what I say now about R1b1b2a1a1d1* might be considered total bunk in fifty years, or even five.

But according to the best estimate as I understand it, this mutation occurred around 2,900 years ago, but it could have been as much as 10,000 years ago. In either case, it is very important to realise that this is before recorded history in the part of the world concerned. Therefore, trying to associate our haplotype with a particular Germanic tribe is a fool's errand: the most ancient names of Germanic tribes that have come down to us today are still too new to be associated with one particular haplotype. On the bright side, though, between then and when recorded history starts, people weren't likely to have migrated all that much, so we can still make some educated guesses.

In prehistory, then, this haplogroup is concentrated around Northern Europe, over a zone covering the north of the present-day Netherlands, Germany, and the south of Denmark. The tricky bit is that until after the end of the last Ice Age, there was a place called Doggerland, connecting Britain to the continent. Apparently it was a good place to hunt mastodon back then, but today it sits at the bottom of the North Sea! (There's one ancestral homeland I won't be visiting.) The significance of this is that, as Doggerland gradually filled in with water, some populations presumably ended up on the north shore, in Britain, and some on the south shore, in continental Europe—among the people who would become the Anglo-Saxons, and end up conquering Britain around AD 600 when the Romans left. So if the mutation occurred before Doggerland disappeared, we wouldn't know for sure whether our ancestor were a Briton or an Anglo-Saxon.

However, it is also quite possible that the mutation took place after Doggerland was already underwater. In this case, the native Britons would not have the R1b1b2a1a1d1* haplotype, and we would know that our ancestor, since he did have it, was an Anglo-Saxon. It is tempting to believe this version since it is more definite, and for that reason a lot of genealogists on the internet are likely to hold by it. Just remember that it might turn out to be inconclusive.

In either case there is a third possible outcome: the R1b1b2a1a1d1* area overlapped with southern Denmark, as I mentioned above. The area inhabited by the Anglo-Saxons before they came to England bordered the land inhabited by the Danes, who invaded England in turn a few centuries later. Since the genetic marker could be present in either population (being far older than either), it is possible that our ancestor might have come to England much later, with the Viking invasions (circa AD 900), and settled there then. Statistically this seems less likely than the Anglo-Saxon option (and Cravenshire is pretty far inland), but we can't know for sure.

My own opinion, then, is that the Anglo-Saxon origin seems the most probable, but that is based on my limited understanding of the numbers of people involved in each population movement. I could be wrong about the probability, or even if I am right about that, our ancestor could fall in a minority case, and there is no way to know.

We know approximately where our paternal ancestor lived in prehistory, through the test, and we know where our ancestors lived in the 1700s through our recorded family history—and we know that there were three historical migrations that would account for how our ancestors got from their starting point, near the present-day Netherlands, to Cravenshire, in the intervening millennia. But genetic genealogy can't tell us which of the three likely scenarios actually happened.

Still, even knowing the scope of possibilities is more specific than it would be otherwise: it still gives us a far clearer picture than if we had no idea of his haplotype. Some Englishmen have ancestries that point to Celtic, Roman, Norman French, Pictish, and Swedish ancestries, to name a few, and at least we can rule all of these out for our ancestor. (Our direct patrilineal ancestor, anyway.) Since Cravenshire was originally settled by Welsh tribes, eliminating the Celtic hypothesis does give me a more concrete picture of my family history.

————————

There is also a DNA test that tells something about the maternal line, looking at the mitochondrial DNA, which is passed from mother to child unmodified, and so gives info about the maternal ancestor (in this case my great-grandmother Ruth Leary's mother's mother's mother, etc.). This was a lot less informative, though, because the mtDNA group, Pre-HV, is such an early mutation (circa 25,000 to 50,000 years ago) that it can be found in nearly any Caucasian person. But I record it here for the sake of anyone else descended from the same maternal ancestor. Unfortunately, though, the mtDNA test doesn't give a lot of information with which to speculate on the family history of one's matrilineal ancestry.

Posted by jon at 12:01 AM in Fatherhood 
 

Tuesday, 18 October 2011

College Profile: University College

This is an article in my series on Oxford's colleges and PPHs. These 'profiles' are based entirely on my own personal perspective and opinions; prospective students are advised to look rather to the prospectus and alternative prospectus of any college they are considering applying to, rather than place too much stock in my descriptions. Previous articles discuss Nuffield College, the PPHs, and All Souls' College.

Some people who misunderstand the college system at Oxford (which I explain here) become confused when faced with the profusion of colleges that one discovers when considering the university up close. (Americans are particularly likely to be lost, since "college" and "university" are generally taken as synonyms Stateside.) They know they have heard of Oxford, and that it is tremendously prestigious, but they have never heard of these other odd names like Oriel, Balliol, and Brasenose.

In the face of all these unexpected names, they may come to the erroneous understanding that "Oxford" must really mean University College and that these other colleges are hangers-on and not the "real Oxford". (Yes, "Oxford University College" sounds perfectly redundant to American ears, but perhaps they had to insist, given the presence of all these 'counterfeit' Oxfords!)


In practice Oxford, like Boston, does have "hanger-on" academic institutions for those who wish to study in these beautiful cities, but who do not have the chops to attend the more prestigious university in town. (Oxford Brookes University is the largest of these—and at least it is a real university, unlike the rather less reputable "Oxford Tutorial College" or "Oxford Business College".)

Unfortunately, because the university is named for the town, unlike Harvard and MIT, the more dishonest of these students come in order to say afterwards that they "studied at Oxford", which I find quite annoying. Most don't do this, of course—as getting found out can be pretty humiliating. But anyway, the point here is not to disparage the non-university education that takes place in Oxford, but only to make clear that the colleges that make up the University of Oxford are all part of one university, the oldest in the English-speaking world—and University College is neither the most authentic nor the preëminent one of these in any particular way.

That said, among Oxford colleges, University has an excellent reputation. Bill Clinton, Stephen Hawking, and C. S. Lewis are just a few of its famous old members, and being founded in 1249 it is a contender for the title of oldest college in the university. (NB, the university itself is over a century older than any of its colleges; the colleges were founded as communities of scholars who were at the university.) Univ, clearly, has a lot to recommend it—but then so does every Oxford college.

Nowadays (perhaps because of the aforementioned misunderstanding of the whole collegiate system, but I hope not!) it hosts the largest number of international undergraduate students. On the graduate level, it is the only college with both graduates and undergraduates that does not accept MBA students, for reasons known only to them. (Not every college can accept students in every course, in fairness—and Univ has few graduate students to begin with, being overwhelmingly an undergraduate college.) So, while I can confirm that Univ has a great location, history, and beautiful architecture—I would say that, though, as architecturally it is the college that most resembles Oriel—I did not spend much time there while at Oxford. One society that I belonged to had some meetings there, and I did enjoy showing guests the Shelley Memorial, but I never did have the honour of dining there—which I regret only because Univ has the longest Latin grace of any college, which would have been nice to hear in person at least once.

Posted by jon at 5:55 AM in Oxford 
 

Monday, 10 October 2011

College Profile: All Souls' College

This is an article in my series on Oxford's colleges and PPHs. These 'profiles' are based entirely on my own personal perspective and opinions; prospective students are advised to look rather to the prospectus and alternative prospectus of any college they are considering applying to, rather than place too much stock in my descriptions. Previous articles describe what colleges are, then discuss Nuffield College and the PPHs.

All Souls' College is truly unique among the colleges and PPHs of the University of Oxford. Like Nuffield, it has an enormous endowment and does not admit MBA students. Unlike Nuffield, though—or any other college, for that matter—it does not admit any students—neither undergraduate nor postgraduate! No, this enormous, wealthy college, situated right on Radcliffe square at the very centre of the university, exists solely for the benefit of its fellows—it is the unique case of a faculty-only college. (*Some fellows do read for postgraduate degrees while at All Souls', but since they are already fellows I consider them more akin to faculty than postgrad students. Others' definitions may vary.)

That alone is enough to cause any Oxbridge academic to daydream about one day becoming one of these élite fellows, who can devote themselves to their research and teaching in a fantastic, exclusive, and well-funded setting. The dream is all the more tantalising because of the way one becomes an All Souls' fellow: it is not through some hidden old boys' network that no ordinary mortal could ever dream of penetrating, a Crown appointment, or some other inaccessible method. No, to become an All Souls' fellow, you just need to pass a test.

The All Souls' fellowship examination, as a result, has grown to mythical status within the university, and world-wide. Winners are rewarded with seven years' paid fellowship at this über-prestigious college, able to carry on their research in the most ideal setting imaginable. And forever thereafter, the line "Fellow, All Souls' College, Oxford" on the winners' CV commands instant respect even in the most rarefied stratospheres of academia.

If this were not enough, for a long time the exam itself was the subject of fascination. Besides viva voce and four three-hour written components, a fifth written component, also three hours long, was given to all candidates, irrespective of their specialty. It consisted of a single word. (Such as "water".) Candidates could take this any way they wanted, and write for three hours on it.

The goal, no doubt, was to identify candidates who displayed creativity and were all-around interesting people, besides just having academic strength, since, as I described before, at Oxford, graduates do their research primarily within their department. A college is a place to eat, sleep, and socialise. Thus, while the fellows are primarily looking for candidates with the best chance to produce important scholarship if afforded this tremendous opportunity, they also want people at their dinner table who are going to be interesting and engaging to talk to.

Unfortunately, I suspect that the one-word essay, as its fame grew, drew many people to try their hand at the examination just because they thought it would be fun. Having masses of mediocre scholars slogging through the exam just to see what the word would be that year may have been fun for the curious test-takers, but certainly would not be for the fellows who had to read their answers. So, recently this component has been removed from the exam, and the fellows rely instead on the viva voce to form their opinion about the candidate's ability to engage in stimulating and interesting conversation.

While becoming an 'insider' at All Souls' in the full sense is out of most people's reach, I was in fact as an Oxford student able to spend quite a lot of time at the college. Every term the college hosts lecture series, which are either open to the public or to university members, on a variety of topics that are of interest to the fellows. Attending these lectures is both intellectually stimulating, and gives an opportunity to see the college from the inside. The college's greatest asset, though, for me, was the Codrington Library.

Probably the most magnificent college library in Oxford (although Queen's and Lincoln could contest that claim), the enormous, majestic spaces of this library made it my favourite place to study in Oxford. As a postgraduate, I was able to obtain a Codrington reader's card, and I found myself going to this library more than any other when I had studying to do in the day time (its shorter opening hours are its only bad point—well, that, and the fact that it was built on money gained from the slave trade). It was a special experience, and I am very grateful to All Souls' College for making its library available to recommended postgraduates.

All Souls' represents in many ways the quintessence of Oxford's élitist "carrot and stick" approach to running a university: When one visits the city as a tourist, one envies the students that can get inside the colleges. When one attends as a visiting student, one envies the privileges of the matriculated students. As a matriculated student, one envies the privileges of those that can dine at High Table. And, even those at High Table, envy those who can dine at All Souls'.

To many outside the Oxbridge system, such traditions, rooted in hierarchy, may seem outdated. For those on the inside, however, they represent a continuous draw, motivating us to strive to do more—the system is set up in such a way that one's own achievements never seem to be enough, within Oxford. I believe that these continual incentives to achieve more are a great part of what makes Oxbridge perform so well—and in that respect, All Souls' College, abode of the brightest of the bright, must be seen as a key component of making the system a success.

Posted by jon at 6:30 AM in Oxford 
 

Thursday, 6 October 2011

Smoking Jacket Power

One of the staples of life in Oxford was the profusion of black-tie events, of which there are literally dozens every year, making owning one's own dinner jacket, studded shirt, and formal trousers a social necessity. A luxurious alternative to the dinner jacket (known Stateside as the tuxedo) is the smoking jacket—indeed, a tailored velvet smoking jacket is perhaps the most luxurious article of clothing a man can own. I recently debuted my own at a black tie dinner at Blenheim palace (the residence of the Duke of Marlborough and birthplace of Winston Churchill), a commensurately opulent location, where it was well received. (My favourite compliment was, "Craven, you look like you own this place!")

Here then is what the smoking jacket looks like. Mine is the more traditional double-breasted version, with frog closures—if one is going to go for a smoking jacket, there is no reason not to go whole hog. As this is a new acquisition, the sleeves wear over-long, but should settle to a proper length as the crease builds in the arms.

Unfortunately, this photo truly does not do the garment justice. Indeed, no photo can capture what wearing one of these feels like. If I had to try, however, I would submit that the following is a crude approximation. (Click to enlarge, or click here to see the original opus, for those who do not recognise the allusion. Or those who merely desire the appropriate musical accompaniment!).

Posted by jon at 12:01 AM in Personal 
 

Sunday, 2 October 2011

"College" Profile: The Permanent Private Halls

This is an article in my series on Oxford's colleges and PPHs. These 'profiles' are based entirely on my own personal perspective and opinions; prospective students are advised to look rather to the prospectus and alternative prospectus of any college they are considering applying to, rather than place too much stock in my descriptions. Previous articles describe what colleges are, and describe Nuffield College.

Permanent Private Halls, or PPHs, are unique to the University of Oxford. Other collegiate universities, like Durham and the Other Place, do not have this category of hall. So what is it about?

The short answer is that a PPH is a hall where university students live, eat, and go to chapel together, just as a college is. (Although, as I will explain, chapel attendance is likely much higher in a PPH than in the typical college!) The difference, formally, is that in a college, the fellows of the college (i.e. the faculty members) govern the college and handle its affairs. In a PPH, they do not.

Self-governance, of course, implies that colleges are financially independent, having an endowment of at least a certain size, as well as institutionally independent. It follows, then, that the PPHs are smaller and less well-off, and are dependent on an outside organisation. In practical terms, the "outside organisation" is a religious one: The easiest case to understand, I think, is that of the Roman Catholic religious orders. They have their own organisation and outside affiliation, being a part of their order, but have many members who study at the university, and so they operate PPHs. The Jesuits run Campion Hall, the Benedictines run St. Benets, the Dominicans run Blackfriars, and until recently the Capuchin Franciscans had Greyfriars. These PPHs house religious members of their orders or other religious who wish to do research degrees at Oxford, as well as candidates for ordination, and laity reading relevant subjects.

Because the members of a religious order are bound to follow the discipline of their rule, and must be under a superior, it is therefore out of the question that these houses should be self-governing. However, in order for these monks, friars, and priests to be able to study at Oxford, they needed to belong to a college or hall (a mandatory requirement of the university, in modern times). Thus the Permanent Private Hall emerged as a means to accomodate these twin needs.

In the early days, men tended to join a religious order around age 18, and so they would attend Oxford as a part of their training, studying non-religious subjects (chemistry, mathematics, history), in order to teach in Catholic schools. Today this has become rare; a typical novice monk today will be in his early thirties, and not rarely already hold an advanced degree in theology or philosophy. With this change, the role of the PPHs has changed considerably: now most religious members are doing doctoral work, or teaching, while the students will be non-religious undergraduates—ordinary Oxford students who may have choosen the hall for its Catholic ethos, or simply because it was the place they were allocated at Oxford.

The one exception to this trend is Campion Hall: since it is not uncommon for a Jesuit to hold two Ph.D.s, their educational needs are not so easily sated. Consequently, that hall continues to operate as a house to educate the order's own members (as well as diocesan and non-Jesuit priests), and is more or less closed to laymen (with rare exceptions).

With the change in role of the other houses, however, comes a calling into question of the continued purpose of the PPH, and different houses have answered this in different ways. For the Dominicans, continued engagement with academia is central to their Order's identity, so Blackfriars (which was founded by friars sent to Oxford by St. Dominic himself) continues to have a strong sense of purpose, and plays a very active and engaged role in the academic life of the university.

Greyfriars, on the other hand, came to decide that operating a hall for undergraduates was not in line with their core purpose. Since Vatican II there has been a trend among Franciscans of returning to their core mission of serving the poorest of the poor, and so its members have been gradually withdrawing from parish work and schooling. With no need to train new brothers as teachers, and running an Oxford Hall not exactly qualifying as service to the poorest of the poor, the decision to close the PPH makes sense—although it is unfortunate, sentimentally speaking, to see such a historic hall no longer part of the university (first founded in 1224, the old Greyfriars was home to Duns Scotus, William of Occam, and Roger Bacon).

St. Benet's, like Blackfriars, plans to continue, and because the Benedictines do run schools as a part of their mission, they see operating a house for Oxford undergraduates as compatible with their purpose. The monks would like to see St. Benet's grow to become an independent priory (requiring six monks in permanent residence—not including those who come there temporarily to study or teach), and I do hope that this comes to pass. Although it may be a challenge: if I were a monk, I would probably be reluctant to leave a spacious, peaceful monastery in the countryside for a crowded house on the busy St. Giles' Street!

In addition to these Roman Catholic PPHs, there are also three Protestant ones, although these too are in a state of flux. St. Stephen's House was founded as an Anglo-Catholic hall; since that brand of churchmanship is no longer welcome in the Church of England, St. Stephen's will presumably either be successful in reinventing itself as a liberal hall, or close.

Wycliffe Hall, of the evangelical Anglican bent, is in a stronger position internally, but has on the other hand been attacked by others in the university as being too intellectually close-minded to deserve membership in Oxford University. It will be interesting to see how those tensions evolve over time. I suspect it will depend in large part on how the tension between intellectualism and anti-intellectualism evolves among evangelicals themselves.

Finally, Regent's Park College (Baptist), like (the formerly Presbyterian) Harris Manchester College, and (the formerly Reformed) Mansfield College, would like to free itself of PPH status—and, by extension, religious affiliation—and become a full college of the university, independently governed. This should happen as soon as Regent's Park builds a sufficient endowment to support itself; it seems well on its way.

All in all, then, PPHs are for all intents and purposes like very small colleges with a specific focus on theology and perhaps a few other subjects in the humanities, and having a particular religious affiliation. (Most of Oxford's full colleges are themselves affiliated with the Church of England too—Christ Church is in fact the cathedral of Oxford!—but this is not generally a central feature of their identity, in the way it is for the PPHs.) They do not possess resources (libraries, sporting facilities, student societies etc.) anywhere near what the colleges have to offer their students (excepting Campion Hall, which in many ways actually offers its members more resources per capita), but on the other hand, the PPHs offer a much closer, more personal, community, which for some students more than compensates for their small size.

Posted by jon at 12:01 PM in Oxford 
 

Wednesday, 28 September 2011

College Profile: Nuffield College

I am embarking today on a series of articles about Oxford's colleges and permanent private halls, since they were a topic of fascination for me for years before I even matriculated, and finding information or even opinions about their nuanced differences online was hard to do. These 'profiles' will be general overviews of what the college is like, based entirely on my own personal opinions; prospective students are advised to look rather to the prospectus and alternative prospectus of any college they are considering applying to, rather than place too much stock in my unashamedly idiosyncratic descriptions.

Nuffield College is in many ways quite atypical. It is extremely wealthy, yet paradoxically quite young, founded in 1937. So its large endowment is not the result of centuries of building up wealth like St. John's or Christ Church. It is for postgraduate students only, and (uncommonly for an Oxford college, but not entirely so for a postgraduate one) has a particular subject focus. (Remember that at Oxford, university departments are a completely separate hierarchy from the college system.) Nuffield's focus is on the social sciences—but, as a final paradox, it does not accept MBA students in spite of this specialty!

Nuffield, then, is a small community of about seventy faculty and seventy-five postgraduate students, all engaged in research in the social sciences. This small size, narrow focus, and great wealth make Nuffield something of a dream location for those who want to do advanced research in economics, sociology, or political science. The college is located away on one edge of the university, near the railway station, and all in all gives off an aura of peaceful tranquility and a focus on research.

Nuffield has a lot of resources relative to the size of its student body; fortunately, it is one of the rare colleges that allows graduates from outside the college to use its library, although without the borrowing privileges of college members (who, besides access to an above-average amount of funding, also get their own offices!). The library is a great resource, with a lot of material that is of interest to business students, and it is located near the business school.

What I particularly like about studying at Nuffield is the unique architecture—quite unlike the Gothic and Tudor architecture one typically sees around Oxford. The exterior is very cozy (apart from the imposing tower!), while the interior has a 1950's modernist feel to it that somehow fits, in my mind, with the study of economics. Finally, the tower (many floors of which are part of the library), is a fun place to study when one wants to make no bones about feeling like an "ivory tower scholar", as was bound to happen from time to time when our courses veered to the theoretical! (And the view over Oxford castle is pretty nice, too.)

All in all then, Nuffield is a unique college, which to its clientele must seem to be an ideal offering. In addition, their food at formal hall is, in my opinion, the best in the university, and the dining hall is certainly unique—even if its austere grey architecture is somewhat reminiscent of a Stalinist mausoleum. It is a shame that so many students at Oxford are unaware of Nuffield, but that is to be expected given that it hosts so few researchers, has no boat club, and sits removed from most of the other colleges. Despite, or perhaps because of this, I am glad I took the time to explore their library, and felt very fortunate to have been able to dine there.

Posted by jon at 7:00 AM in Oxford 
 

Friday, 23 September 2011

HSK Proficiency and Literacy

I have talked before about my interest in pursuing the HSK as a long-term goal. The idea of a ranked certificate to showcase my Chinese ability appealed to me as a way to put a definite achievement milestone along the practically infinite road of learning Chinese characters. I will probably never be able to say I speak Chinese fluently, but if I pass HSK level 3 or 4, I will at least have that to hang my hat on.

Recently, though, I decided to test out just how much Chinese proficiency that level of mastery would actually get me. Using the character lists I found here, I coded up a little program that takes a website and highlights the characters that are included at a given HSK level.

The resulting program was actually pretty interesting to play around with. Trying it on different websites, with different types of content, allowed me to see, visually, how much I would be able to read after having learned a given number of characters. For example, here is a section from the Wikipedia article on railroads (chosen as an example of a page with fairly straightforward content), with only the level one vocabulary (176 characters) highlighted in pink:

That should make it fairly clear that at HSK Level 1, one remains quite illiterate. (As I can testify from experience!) Now here is the same text with HSK levels 1-4 highlighted (the most I ever expect to learn, 1067 characters). In this and the following image, the different shades of pink are progressively lighter according to the level of the character (1, 2, 3, or 4 in this case):

Finally, here is what one who achieves the full HSK levels 1-6 (that's 2631 characters) would know. Again, the lightest characters are those of the highest level; the black ones are those that a reader still would not recognise even after learning the entire HSK list:

While it is said that at level 4, one has mastered enough characters to read 90% of Chinese text, and at level 6 that number rises to 98%, viewing the texts in this way allows one to see things in more practical terms: a level 4 reader can read a text, but it will require a lot of trips to the dictionary to do so, making it quite a chore to get through anything more than half a page long.

At level 6, reading is much more fluid, but still by no means perfect. Still, dictionary trips are rare enough that one should be able to read real texts, even long ones, when motivated enough to do so (in the example above, learning 轨—gui3, 'rail'—alone, would eliminate half of the black characters remaining in the text).

This is probably why the HSK only tests up to this level: once one has attained this level of literacy, the remaining 1500-odd characters that an adult Chinese person knows can be picked up in the wild, in the course of immersing oneself in the Chinese language, rather than through further classroom learning.

I thought I would share these findings, because I think it is a useful visual illustration, even for someone who cannot read any Chinese, of what knowing a certain number of characters actually gets you.

Posted by jon at 7:30 AM in Languages 
 
 
Non enim id agimus ut exerceatur vox, sed ut exerceat.